Solutions For RealSolutions For Real
  • Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest finance news and updates directly to your inbox.

Top News

4 Steps To Build A Portfolio Of Lifetime Retirement Income

June 25, 2025

7 Medications Linked to a Higher Risk of Falling (Most Might Surprise You)

June 25, 2025

25 High-Paying Remote Jobs With Salaries of $100,000 (or Higher)

June 25, 2025
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • 4 Steps To Build A Portfolio Of Lifetime Retirement Income
  • 7 Medications Linked to a Higher Risk of Falling (Most Might Surprise You)
  • 25 High-Paying Remote Jobs With Salaries of $100,000 (or Higher)
  • LGBTQ Couple Started a Business With 80 Goats, See $150M+ Sales
  • Federal Judge: Anthropic Acted Legally With AI Book Training
  • The False Promise Of Retirement Target-Date Mutual Funds
  • Is This Beloved Herb the Key to Fighting Alzheimer’s Disease?
  • Why the Housing Market Standoff Could Be Your Best Chance to Make a Deal
Wednesday, June 25
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Solutions For RealSolutions For Real
Subscribe For Alerts
  • Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
Solutions For RealSolutions For Real
Home » New Credit Card Regulations Will Hurt Consumers And Small Business
Banking

New Credit Card Regulations Will Hurt Consumers And Small Business

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 5, 20230 Views0
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email Tumblr Telegram

OBSERVATIONS FROM THE FINTECH SNARK TANK

Proposed government regulations would change how credit card payments are processed, impacting how much financial institutions can charge merchants for payment transactions.

The Credit Card Competition Act of 2023—nicknamed “Durbin 2.0” after its co-sponsor, Sen. Dick Durbin, who enacted debit card regulations following the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010—would require every credit card transaction to have two networks—one of them not Visa or Mastercard—enabled to route transactions.

Today, credit card payments are routed through payment networks, with Visa and Mastercard dominating the market. Under the proposed regulation, merchants would have the option to route transactions to other lower-cost networks (lower-cost to the merchants, that is).

Proponents of the bill argue that it will be a boon for Americans because—allegedly—“excessive” credit-card processing fees push up the cost of consumer goods.

Durbin 1.0: Making The Rich Even Richer

Durbin’s first amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act (Durbin 1.0) reduced the amount of interchange fees banks could charge merchants. It was sold to the American people as a benefit to them because merchants were expected to pass along the savings.

But that didn’t happen.

Numerous studies, including some from the Federal Reserve Bank, found that merchants—in particular, Amazon, Target, and Walmart—used the savings from Durbin Amendment to pad their profits, enabling billionaires like Bezos and the Walton family to get even richer.

Consumers, meanwhile, saw their debit card rewards and free checking accounts go down the drain.

What Does Not Kill Me Makes Me Stronger (Or Bigger)

The proposed bill—as described by its sponsors—would increase competition by enabling merchants to select payment networks other than Visa and Mastercard. The real impact, however, would be just the opposite.

The government is creating a game of whack-a-mole: Increased competition in one sector will lead to diminished competition in another. As Todd Zywicki, professor at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, recently wrote:

“By artificially pushing down interchange fees on credit cards, the bill would curb an important revenue stream for banks. Larger banks, which have gotten even bigger since Dodd-Frank was enacted, could offset such losses by selling investment advice, mortgages and other products—or by imposing new fees as they did in response to the original Durbin amendment. Small banks lack these revenue streams and would have to raise fees, curtail services or merge, fueling industry consolidation.”

It’s ironic that proposed financial regulations from sponsors who want to see large financial firms broken up will actually make them larger.

Consumers Are Big Losers Under the New Regulations

Consumers are the big losers under the proposed regulations. According to Zywicki:

“Consumers, who already face rising bank fees and reduced rewards from the first Durbin amendment, could see the return of more fees and higher interest rates. Experts warn that Durbin-Vance would put an end to popular frequent-flier and other card reward programs. Pushing the use of lesser-known card networks also might compromise consumer data security.”

The importance of—and the impact of the proposed regulations—on data security and fraud prevention should not be overlooked or minimized.

In a Cornerstone Advisors report titled The True Impact of Interchange Regulation: How Government Price Controls Increase Consumer Costs and Reduce Security, author Glenn Grossman points to studies that show that 79% of consumers choose credit cards as a payment option because of their data security and explains:

“Visa and MasterCard offer consumers zero liability when a transaction on their branded card is processed on their network. The advantages offered when all credit cards come down one pipe is a single view of the transactional fraud landscape. A change to this format would provide a fragmented fraud landscape. The guarantee of zero liability will be questionable because customers will never know if their card brand processed the transaction or if it was sent through an alternate network.”

A more fragmented fraud landscape will likely result in increased fraud operating costs for payment networks and issuers as utilizing multiple payment networks will force the detection of fraud to the endpoints of the payment process—merchant acquirers and the issuing bank—adding risk and cost.

Merchants and Retailers Will Be Negatively Impacted

If Durbin 2.0 passes, the negative impacts of regulatory whack-a-mole will be felt not just by consumers and banks, but by merchants—large and small—as well.

A higher rate of declined authorizations due to increased fraud rates will frustrate cardholders and ultimately negatively impact merchant revenue.

In addition, Cornerstone Advisors‘ Glenn Grossman opines that merchants could be negatively impacted as consumers spend less as they lose access to rewards and have to pay more in annual fees as card issuers look to recoup their revenue shortfalls.

The Law of Unintended Consequences

It’s hard to believe that proponents of the new regulations—on both sides of the aisle—can’t see second order effects (i.e., unintended consequences) of the proposed rules:

  • Credit crisis. Issuers will need to find revenue replacement and will increase fees and possibly tighten underwriting and credit standards. As margins recede, banks and credit unions offering credit programs wlll tighten credit, reducing the availability of credit to even more Americans.
  • Shadow banking. Higher fees could push more Americans outside of the financial system and into higher-cost alternatives such as payday lending and high interest rate loans from non-bank lenders.
  • New financial behemoths. In fact, higher fees could push more Americans to obtain more financial services from the mega-retailers like Amazon and Walmart who already offer a range of financial products todays. If Chase and Bank of America are too big to provide financial services, why aren’t Walmart and Amazon?
  • Fraud explosion. The requirement to offer multiple payment networks will result in an increase in card-not-present transactions which already have higher rates of fraud than other types of card payments.
  • Tax shortfalls. Reduced consumer spend will result in lower sales tax revenues causing state and local government to raise other taxes to compensate for the decline.

Sadly, even before the second-order negative effects hit, the promised first-order benefits—lower prices for consumers—won’t be realized. With rampant “greedflation” and “wageflation” throughout the economy, merchants will have a myriad of reasons why their savings from Durbin 2.0 won’t be passed on.

As George Mason University’s Zywicki said:

“Durbin’s anti-bank and pro-competition rhetoric might have swayed Sen. Vance and other Republicans. But when shoppers choose certain market alternatives over others, that isn’t a failure of competition. The bill would give big banks and big retailers an advantage at the expense of small banks and consumers—and that is anything but pro-competition.”

For a complimentary copy of the Cornerstone Advisors report The True Impact of Interchange Regulation: How Government Price Controls Increase Consumer Costs and Reduce Security, click here.

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Articles

The Beginning Of The End Of Bank-Fintech ‘Partnerships’

Banking December 6, 2023

Swiss Banque Pictet Admits Conspiring With Americans To Hide Funds

Banking December 5, 2023

One Of America’s Longest-Serving CEOs Has Advice On Humor And Risk

Banking December 2, 2023

6 Resources Investors Can Be Thankful For This Holiday Season

Banking December 1, 2023

From Fintech’s Top Founders To Wall Street’s Best Dealmakers: 30 Under 30 Finance 2024

Banking November 30, 2023

The Evolution Of Bank-Fintech Partnerships

Banking November 29, 2023
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Top News

7 Medications Linked to a Higher Risk of Falling (Most Might Surprise You)

June 25, 20250 Views

25 High-Paying Remote Jobs With Salaries of $100,000 (or Higher)

June 25, 20250 Views

LGBTQ Couple Started a Business With 80 Goats, See $150M+ Sales

June 25, 20250 Views

Federal Judge: Anthropic Acted Legally With AI Book Training

June 25, 20250 Views
Don't Miss

The False Promise Of Retirement Target-Date Mutual Funds

By News RoomJune 24, 2025

If you’re contributing to a 401(k), chances are you’ve been default invested into a retirement…

Is This Beloved Herb the Key to Fighting Alzheimer’s Disease?

June 24, 2025

Why the Housing Market Standoff Could Be Your Best Chance to Make a Deal

June 24, 2025

7 Emergency Funds That Won’t Be Enough in Real Emergencies

June 24, 2025
About Us
About Us

Your number 1 source for the latest finance, making money, saving money and budgeting. follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

We're accepting new partnerships right now.

Email Us: [email protected]

Our Picks

4 Steps To Build A Portfolio Of Lifetime Retirement Income

June 25, 2025

7 Medications Linked to a Higher Risk of Falling (Most Might Surprise You)

June 25, 2025

25 High-Paying Remote Jobs With Salaries of $100,000 (or Higher)

June 25, 2025
Most Popular

This Retiree’s Leisurely Side Hustle Makes $66,000 a Year, No Degree Required

March 1, 20241 Views

15 Best Paid Survey Sites For Kids

December 12, 20231 Views

4 Steps To Build A Portfolio Of Lifetime Retirement Income

June 25, 20250 Views
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Dribbble
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2025 Solutions For Real. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.